Why municipalities are happy with B.C.’s short-term rental changes | | | | | | | The mayors of Vancouver, Victoria, Kelowna and Tofino are quite different when it comes to their political ideologies. But all four of them were singing from the same song book on Monday, after the provincial government announced new regulations on short-term rental units. “I'm delighted,” said Victoria Mayor Marianne Alto. “We are pleased,” enthused Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim. “Well done,” said Tofino Mayor Dan Law. “"We applaud the province's leadership,” said Kelowna Mayor Tom Dyas. Those were all excerpts from statements the province released when announcing the changes. Having boilerplate endorsements is a standard practice when governments announce new policy, and sometimes those statements can be misleading.
But in the case of short-term rentals, there’s plenty of evidence municipalities are very supportive of the changes.
Part of this is simply based on voter sentiment: local politician after local politician at the Union of B.C. Municipalities conference last month implored the province to do something on short-term rentals, whereas complaints were much more concentrated in Vancouver and resort destinations.
And second, mayors are happy that short-term rental hosts will have to register directly with the province, which already has the tax information about whether a property is a primary residence or not.
That, in addition to the province promising to create its own enforcement unit, makes enforcing the rules much easier than the whack-a-mole approach local bylaw officers have been taking to try and deal with the issue.
“We spent an enormous amount of time with our bylaws staff trying to do the detective work,” said Alto.
“This allows us to do some simple work ... to enforce our own regulations.”
At least, that’s the hope from the province and many cities.
But the new rules won’t be fully implemented until after next year’s provincial election.
If rents are still increasing across the province at that time, these new policies will surely be talked about. | | | Elsewhere in British Columbia... | | | | | | | | 1. Surrey | | Around and around we go. On Monday, the province also introduced legislation concerning Surrey’s neverending police jurisdiction saga, effectively making it clear by the letter of the law that municipality can’t go back to the RCMP — and that no future municipality can stop a transition to a different force once it’s approved. Mayor Brenda Locke has vowed to continue the fight in the courts, and one wonders how this will impact the city’s 2024 budget when it’s released in the coming months.
Read more | | | | | 2. Port Coquitlam | Meanwhile, the local politics story generating the most reaction over the weekend was Port Coquitlam council rejecting a childcare development over staff's recommendation, in large part due to complaints at a public hearing. It follows backlash two months ago over Vancouver staff rejecting a similar project for similar reasons, and underlines that it’s a lot easier for municipalities to commit to building more childcare spaces than to actually do it.
Read more in the Tri-City News | | | | | 3. Campbell River | The Vancouver Island community has been embroiled in controversy over a proposal to get rid of a $10,000 property tax exemption for the local art gallery, over concerns they aren’t being “good neighbours” when it comes to a supervised injection site. Council approved the change last Thursday — but also backed away from further changes for all non-profits currently receiving exemptions, and said they would work with the art gallery to find a solution.
Read more in the Times Colonist | | | | | Share this newsletter | | or subscribe if this was forwarded to you. | | | Check out the latest headlines at cbc.ca/bc and follow our municipal affairs reporter Justin McElroy on Twitter. And if you have any questions you might want answered in a future mailbag, drop Justin a line at metromatters@cbc.ca. | | | |